|
OFFICIAL UFO'S ANCIENT ASTRONAUT MAGAZINE
November, 1976 Page 46
B L O
O D O F T H E G O D S
I have no connection to the author of this article.
Are you an Rh Negative blood type? If so you could be a
decendent of the ancient astronauts themselves!
About a year and a half ago my sister Bonnie and I were discussing some
of the unusual characteristics of our family. Bonnie had a problem with
infants haemolytic disease. She has 0 negative blood. She has written
a book including this problem called "The Deux" by Venus Thaddeus. One
of the questions we asked was why does this haemolytic disease occur?
Why, along with the Rh negative blood does our family have such a high
IQ (135-140 average). Why so many psychic experiences? Why this urge
to ask "why?" Why the early maturity or the large head and eyes? Why
have, we always felt we were "different" from other people. And so many
other things to set us apart.
We were raised in the church, but we never received answers to the questions
we asked. Why doesn't anyone else ask these same questions? We are not
satisfied with the answer "just because". Are there others out there
who ask the same questions? Then we heard about the possibility of the
ancient astronauts and the pieces started to fall into place.
For the past decade many people have been working to prove that the
earth has been visited by extraterrestrial beings. Who are these visitors?
Why did they come? Why did they leave? Did they leave?
If earth was visited in the ancient past, are there any descendants
of these visitors? If all mankind are not descendants of these visitors,
which ones are? Who are the "Children of Israel?" Why was their seed
blessed? Why were they told not to inter-marry with other people and
to circumcise their sons for identification? Why were they told to preserve
their geneology? Where did Adam and Eve's sons go to get their wives,
if they were the only "humans" on earth?
Many scientists believe that modern man evolved from ape-like primates.
They have much proof to back up their theories, including modern blood
analysis and comparative studies between modern man and lower anthripoids,
such as the chimpanzee and the Rhesus monkey.
It has been proven that the majority of mankind (85%) has a blood factor
common with the rhesus monkey. This is called rhesus positive blood.
Usually shortened to Rh positive. This factor is completely independent
from the A, B, 0 blood types.
In the study of genetics, we find that we can only inherit what our
ancestors had except in the case of mutation. We can have any of numerous
combinations of traits inherited from all our ancestors. Nothing more
and nothing less. Therefore, if man and ape evolved from a common ancestor,
their blood would have evolved the same way. Blood factors are transmitted
with much more exactitude than any other characteristic. It would seem
that modern man and rhesus monkey may have had a common ancestor sometime
in the ancient past. All other earthly primates also have this Rh factor.
But this leaves out the people who are Rh negative. If all mankind evolved
from the same ancestor their blood would be compatible. Where did the
Rh negatives come from? If they are not the descendants of prehistoric
man, could they be the descendants of the ancient astronauts?
All animals and other living creatures known to man can breed with any
other of their species. Relative size and color makes no difference.
Why does infant's haemolytic disease occur in humans if all humans are
the same species? Haemolytic disease is the allergic reaction that occurs
when an Rh negative mother is carrying a Rh positive child. Her blood
builds up antibodies to destroy an ALIEN substance (the same way it
would a virus), thereby destroying the infant. Why would a mother's
body reject her own offspring? Nowhere else in nature does this occur
naturally. This same problem does occur in mules - a cross between a
horse and donkey. This fact alone points to the distinct possibility
of a cross-breeding between two similar but genetically different species.
No one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from.
Most, familar with blood factors, admit that these people must at least
be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor. If we are
a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why does it continue with the
exact characteristics? Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor,
if it was in their own ancestory? Who was this ancestor? Difficulties
in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group
data, for they are a single gene characteristic and not affected by
the environment.
The Basque people of Spain and France have the highest percentage of
Rh negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and about 60% carry
one (r) negative gene. The average among most people is only 7%-Rh negative,
while some groups have very little. The Oriental Jews of Israel, also
have a high percent Rh negative, although most other Oriental people
have only about 1% Rh negative. The Samaritians and the Black Cochin
Jew also have a high percentage of Rh negative blood, although again
the Rh negative blood is rare among most black people.
Could the Basque people be one of these colonies? Or could it have been
the original colony on earth? The origin of the Basques is unknown.
Their language is unlike any other European language. Some believe that
Basque was the original language of the book of Genesis. Some believe
it was the original language of the world and possibly of the creator.
Genesis 6:2 "The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were
fair; and took them wives, all of which they chose." Who were the children
of these marriages? Genesis 6:4 "God came into the daughters of men,
and they bare children to them, and the same became mighty of old."
From the King James Bible dictionary we find: "menchildren - men of
Israel, male children of God, not children of man - Ex. 34:23." Ex.
34:7 states "The iniquity of the father will be unto the children unto
the fourth generation." It is plain that something is inherited, could
it be the blood?
Blood is mentioned more often than any other word in the Bible, except
God. These two words you will find on almost every page, blood and God!
(The blood of the Gods?) This message has been written for thousands
of years. There is a connection between the blood and the Gods.
The American Indians had the tradition of making good friends, "blood
brothers", if they thought they were worthy. Could this tradition.have
been for a reason? Could they have actually been checking to see if
they were blood brothers (the same type blood)? The clumping (aggulation)
that occurs when Rh positive and Rh negative blood are mixed is visible
to the naked eye. Could they have been told, by their ancestors, that
their blood was different from that of the rest of mankind except for
their brothers and sisters, from other tribes, scattered throughout
the earth. Indian tradition declares that their ancestors were of cosmic
origin. The Indian totem pole is actually a family genealogy.
Why all this preoccupation with genealogy among different people scattered
throughout the earth? No other animal on earth has this preoccupation
with ancestory. Where did this tradition come from? People scattered
throughout the earth, who have had no-known contact with each other
all simultaneously got the urge to chart their family tree. Why? How
important could this have been to primitive cave men? Struggling to
survive, to chart their genealogy? They had no understanding of modern
genetics and inheritance. So why should they preserve their genealogy?
Were they told, by the ancient astronauts, to preserve their heritage,
until a future date when they would return and it would be understood?
Until a time, like now, when their descendent would be able to understand
the message they were leaving.
Although they probably didn't realize the importance of preserving their
genealogy, they were told that future generations would understand.
Are we that future generation? Was there a message left for us to understand?
Do we have the courage to look for the answer?
Do we really want to know or would we rather keep our heads buried in
the sand? What we don't know will still affect us. You will not see
unless you look. Only through knowledge will we find truth.
I have searched, in vain, for scientific proof that the Rh negative
blood was a natural earthly occurrence. Instead I have found proof that
the Rh negative had not evolved on earth in the natural course of events.
For many years people have been searching for the wrong thing. Could
the true "missing link" actually be man himself? The unknown link between
earth and the stars - hybrid man. Man may be the missing link between
primate and extraterrestrial. It seems inconceivable to me that those
working on the evolution theory have overlooked this possibility. How
can they state, that these people are lacking a factor contained in
all other earthly primates, including the naked ape, and not ask why?
What other characteristics are common among these people that are uncommon
to other people? Is there a real difference other than just a different
blood?
A very good comparative study between man and the primates can be found
in Max Flindt's book "Mankind, Child of the Stars," Fawcett publisher,
Books 1 and 2. He has documented many of the characteristics we may
have received from our cosmic ancestors. It does show quite conclusively
that mankind is a hybrid between our cosmic ancestor and our earth ancestor.
I have merely carried this idea to its logical conclusion. If mankind
is a hybrid descendant of the ancient' astronauts, surely there would
be some, appearing periodically, who would be genetically very similar
to them. Would this not include their psychic powers? Could the great
sleeping prophet, Edgar Cayce, have been one of these? Could Jesus Christ
also have been one of these? A true descendant of the ancient astronauts.
If he was a true genetic duplicate of them he would also have their
powers and possibly their knowledge. I cannot say whether he was born
with this knowledge or whether he established psyphic communication
with our cosmic family, but it is plain that he had powers far beyond
those of mortal man. Could he have been an example of what the ancient
astronauts were like? Jesus stated that the Father and him were one.
Could he have actually meant that literally? He may have been an exact
duplicate of his (our) ancient Father. He may have even been a clone
of the cosmonauts. Everyone knows the story of his virgin birth and
the heavenly intervention. Could this have been implanting a clone into
Mary's sterilized egg? Could the whole egg have actually been an implant?
The Rh negative blood, which appears not to have originated on earth,
may prove to be a major factor in proving mankind is a hybrid. It is
not the whole answer but it is a key for unlocking the genetic puzzle
of our heritage. Tissue factors will also prove to be quite revealing.
Scientists are now able to determine the tissue factors of 5000 year
old mummies. Could some of these mummies have been the ancient astronauts?
Why were these mummies preserved well enough for us to analyze their
blood and tissue factors? Could there be a message in the genetic factors
of the mummies themselves?
There is an interesting fact found in the book "X-Raying the Pharaohs"
by James Harris and Kent Weeks, 1973 (Scribners). Upon x-raying the
tomb of Makare, high priestess of Ammon, it was found that the infant
buried with her labeled Prince Moutenihet was actually a female hamadryas
baboon. An examination of Makare showed she had given birth shortly
before dying. Could she have given birth to the baboon found with her?
Why else would it have been buried with her? A genetic throwback?
My research has shown that the majority of those with psychic powers
also have Rh negative blood. Most psyphic and faith healers also have
this blood. Strangely enough, many of those doing research into the
ancient astronaut theory and other phenomea also have Rh negative blood.
Erich von Daniken has Rh negative blood and a thirst for the truth.
Brad Steiger also has Rh negative blood. His new book "Gods of Aquarius"
considers this possibility. Robert Antone Wilson, author of "Illuminus",
also has this blood. There are many others too numerous to list here.
Why is there such a large percentage of negative in these unusual fields?
Could we have a vague memory of what we are looking for? It has been
said that a question is not asked until the answer is known.
There are about 5000 known blood factors and all of these must contribute
to the complete picture. But the Rh negative blood is the place to start
our search.
A comparative analysis is now being done and we need your help. If you
are reading this, you must be one of the lost children of Israel. Anyone
else would not have read this far
(copyright 1976, all rights reserved)
LINKS
Human
Genes
The
12th planet
Bible
Connection
Music:
That's Life |